<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dip Studio UK &#187; Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dipstudio.co.uk/so/good/t/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dipstudio.co.uk/so</link>
	<description>web assessment consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:50:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO strategy maturity model</title>
		<link>http://dipstudio.co.uk/so/seo-strategy-maturity-model</link>
		<comments>http://dipstudio.co.uk/so/seo-strategy-maturity-model#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xekc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search marketing tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dipstudio.co.uk/so/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What SEO strategy maturity levels could be named for Search Engine Optimization discipline? One recent brief I did had this formula I&#8217;d like to drop in here: Outbound + (Technical + (Social + (Local + (Strategic)))). The more you go towards the core &#8211; the more long term effect you get, the more mature your SEO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What SEO strategy maturity levels could be named for Search Engine Optimization discipline? One recent brief I did had this formula I&#8217;d like to drop in here: <strong>Outbound + (Technical + (Social + (Local + (Strategic))))</strong>.</p>
<p>The more you go towards the core &#8211; the more long term effect you get, the more mature your SEO efforts are.</p>
<p>Search engine SPAM should act as Level0 &#8211; irresponsible and immature. Rest up could be defined in a similar manner:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Outbound SEO</strong> (external, off-site) &#8211; done with <strong>minimal</strong> or even without any emerging to <strong>business</strong> and website <strong>strategy</strong>. It’s basically incoming link building + some basic website meta information tasks (title/meta description/metatags/headings/keywords in content) + sitemaps and other minor information architecture/usability related works. <br />It mostly relates on finding holes and faults in existing deployment/code/URL scheme etc. and is normally chaotic, unpredictable and reactive.  Most, I’d say 90%+ consulting companies/consultants on the market are in this “safe zone” as long as most projects have enough faults to have ranking/traffic jumps just by fixing those + it’s quite effective in the short term. Improve content/meta, build links, get few quick top10s = profit!</li>
<li><strong>Technical SEO</strong> comes in to change URL scheme, normally changes site information architecture, template code layout, proposes on new pages/sections, comes in with a <strong>defined custom SEO process</strong>. It’s often much more complicated, relies on a strong support from the development team (often has it&#8217;s own dev team) &#8211; sometimes pushes for “a lot of work for a very uncertain outcome”. That’s our role sometimes. Doing technical SEO you normally slip into deep involvement with all project activities and eventually into participation in project producing as such.</li>
<li><strong>Social / viral</strong> is rarely or never done by SEO company alone and works much better with in-house marketing lead or with SEM/PR/SMM/Viral agency in partnership. From SEO perspective it&#8217;s all link bait &#8211; social media/viral marketing attracts deep incoming links.</li>
<li><strong>Local</strong> (/ international) is the hardest level to reach &#8211; it normally involves a lot of complicated technical problems to solve, a lot of additional pages to build (while escaping duplicated/canned content issue at all costs). It&#8217;s barely impossible without huge amounts of user-generated content. Requires resources, ambition, time, effort, etc. &#8211; as long as puts every piece of content into a multitude of local contexts.</li>
<li><strong>Strategic SEO</strong> is a barely impossible &#8211; to do post-factum. So the only way to do it is to plan in advance, be 100% proactive, do SEO before launching any new modules, parts of the project. It takes SEO up close to brand management level, sometimes merging with it completely.</li>
</ol>
<p>So that&#8217;s first draft on &#8220;strategy maturity&#8221; and I guess it needs a &#8220;process maturity&#8221; to become a 2D evaluation tool. I&#8217;ll try to jot down the &#8220;process maturity&#8221; levels in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dipstudio.co.uk/so/seo-strategy-maturity-model/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

